Photography and Fact essays

Photography and Fact essays For many years photography has been used to document the most significant of events, whether they affect an entire society, like a war, or a specific persons' life, such as a wedding. The reason that photography is used for such occasions instead of painting, drawing or sculpting is quite simple. It is because photography is the most remarkable of the fine arts. Other forms of art, are aesthetically pleasing and important in their own rite, but photography is so monumental because of the power that only it possesses. This is the power to depict fact. One aspect that makes photography so creditable is that it can show feeling and emotion so much more vividly and doubtlessly than a drawing can. For instance, during the Great Depression "the harsh realities were recorded thanks to the initiative of the Farm Security Administration (Daval, 186)." At this time, Dorothea Lange "documented the bitter poverty of migrant workers and their families (20th Century Photography, 1). These images, such as Migrant Mother and Cotton Picker near Firebrough, show, so clearly and almost effortlessly, the pain and despair that was occurring too frequently at this time. There is a loss of hope that is so clear and evident in these photographs from the longing in the eyes of the images shown. Such raw emotion is hard to come by in any other art form. Another reason photography is more trustworthy than other forms of art, is because the image that appears in a photograph, whether it is of a person or an event, has at one point existed or happened. This statement does not always hold true for paintings, sculptures, and drawings. It is simple and usual for an artist to conjure up an image of a person that has never existed and turn them into a work of art. For example, there has been a great deal of speculation about whether or not Leonardo Da Vinci's Mona Lisa is a portrait of a real person. Before the relatively r ...

Answers to Questions About Prepositions

Answers to Questions About Prepositions Answers to Questions About Prepositions Answers to Questions About Prepositions By Mark Nichol Here are several questions from DailyWritingTips.com readers about use of prepositions, and my responses. 1. I was always taught, â€Å"Never use a preposition to end a sentence.† For example, â€Å"I want to go with† should be â€Å"I also want to go,† or â€Å"Use the dustbin to throw the rubbish in† should be â€Å"Throw the rubbish in the dustbin.† Yet you have done so with the word out in the sentence â€Å"California gave a record $100 million loan to bail schools out.† Is it OK to end sentences with prepositions? The admonition to never end a sentence with a proposition has no valid grammatical basis: For example, â€Å"She was the one he wanted to go out with† is correct. (Here is one of several DailyWritingTips.com posts on the topic.) Earlier placement of a preposition in a sentence makes the sentence sound more formal, but efforts to consistently do so sometimes result in awkwardly stiff syntax, as in â€Å"She was the one out with which he wanted to go.† (However, â€Å"I want to go with† is a different matter; as a truncated version of â€Å"I want to go with you,† it’s colloquial and not suited for formal writing.) 2. I am reading a very well-written book, but I’ve run across an expression that grates: The author wrote at least twice of â€Å"a couple weeks† or â€Å"a couple trees† (or whatever), where I have always said â€Å"a couple of.† I can’t figure out which expression is the correct one. Have you covered this, or can you advise me? This post is one of several at DailyWritingTips.com that discusses couple. â€Å"A couple of† is the correct form, but either the author chose to be colloquial, or neither he nor his editors know the correct usage. 3. I have always thought that â€Å"outside of† is incorrect when used this way: â€Å"The man was outside of the house† (as opposed to â€Å"The man was outside the house†). Am I right? Using the preposition of is usually superfluous in such constructions, but it’s not incorrect, and in the senses of â€Å"besides† and â€Å"apart from,† it’s necessary. Some grammar handbooks advise playing this usage by ear. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:100 Beautiful and Ugly WordsWhat's a Male Mistress?What is an Anagram?